Muslims are fine with killing non-Muslims, but will do almost anything to avoid killing other Muslims

ACTIONS speak louder than words. Another interesting item  regarding Sharia Law. Why has Barack Hussein Obama insisted that the  U.S. Attorney General hold the trials of the 911 Muslim Terrorists in  Civilian Courts as Common Criminals instead of as Terrorists who  attacked the United States of America? If the Muslim Terrorists are  tried in Military Tribunals, convicted and sentenced to death, by LAW,  Barack Hussein Obama, as President of the United States, would be  required to sign their Death Warrants. He would not be required to sign  the death warrants if they are sentenced to death by a Civilian Court.  Recently, Muslim Jihadist, Army Major Hassan slaughtered non-Muslim,  soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas rather than go to Afghanistan and be a part  of anything that could lead to the deaths of fellow Muslims. He stated  that Muslims could not and should not kill fellow Muslims. Is the  motive for Barack Hussein Obama’s insistence on civilian trials, to make sure he doesn’t have to sign the death warrants for the Muslim  Terrorists? Why would he, as President of the United States, not sign  the death warrants for Muslim Terrorists who attacked the United States  and murdered over 3,000 U. S. Citizens on 9/11? Could it be that he is  FORBIDDEN by his RELIGION to authorize the execution of Muslims?